The Winnepeg Jets
By Jordan Lalor
After a brief 15-year hiatus, the NHL has returned to Winnipeg, but is that a good thing? If you ask someone from Winnipeg, they would say “Yes” with an ecstatic smile from ear to ear. If you asked someone from Atlanta, you would probably hear a “Yes” too, because chances are they have no idea that it’s their hometown Thrashers who have relocated to central Canada. The primary concern with this move is whether or not the NHL can redeem itself in a city where it had previously failed. It didn’t work in Atlanta, which is now the only city to have lost two NHL franchises. Hopefully Winnipeg won’t follow suit.
The Thrashers were bad, but you can’t blame wins and losses for their lack of support. Unlike the Thrashers, the original Atlanta Flames were actually successful. They made the playoffs in six of their first eight seasons, yet people still didn’t go to the games. Two decades later, with record setting lows, the attendance in Atlanta remained the third worst in the league. Clearly not much had changed. The worst part was that the Thrashers were an organization that genuinely cared for its players while the rest of the community forgot they existed. They were like the rescue shelter of the NHL. I’m surprised Thrashers ownership didn’t put out emotionally evoking commercials of their players with Sarah McLachlan singing “Arms of an Angel” in a desperate attempt to garner some support.
Now, lets move 1,600 miles North…
For you lucky fans in Winnipeg, don’t take it for granted this time around. In 1996, the Jets didn’t just relocate to Glendale, AZ because the weather was better. Hockey is a business; teams need to be supported with both the hearts and wallets of their fans. True, the Jets couldn’t afford to stay in a Canadian city at a time when the Royal Mint might as well have been producing Monopoly money, but did you ever think that a lack of fan support was to blame? That seems to be the common denominator with failed franchises. Average attendance at Jets games fell to a measly 11,000 in their final season. Where were you guys then? With temperatures in Winnipeg reaching absolute zero, I certainly don’t blame anyone for wanting to watch the game from the comfort of their own home. Unfortunately for the Jets, most of their fans opted to do just that. My question is, why wouldn’t they go to the games? What else is there to do in Winnipeg anyways? Nothing. Trust me, I lived there. But hey, sometimes you don’t know what you have until you lose it. Winnipeg let the Jets go once, lets hope they learned their lesson.
It’s nice that the Thrashers are moving back to Winnipeg so another Canadian city can actively express its carnal love for hockey. That’s just fantastic, but what I can’t figure out is why anyone would want this particular Thrashers team. They were terrible. I cringe whenever I get stuck with them as my random choice in NHL ’11. The bottom line is, you can put a turd in a tuxedo, but it’s still a turd. That’s precisely what the NHL has done here by relocating this team to Winnipeg. Fans in Winnipeg, enjoy watching hockey, just don’t expect to see the cup there anytime soon.
Home Town Blog Post: Boston Bruins!
By Tim Doyle, Pure Hockey
If you are reading a hockey blog (which you are), then chances are you know what happened in the Stanley Cup Finals this season. The Boston Bruins, after a 39-year drought, won the Stanley Cup in Game 7 in Vancouver. It was meant to be. Too much had gone right this season for the Bruins to lose. The revived fan base and buzz that was surrounding the Hub of Hockey just was not going to accept failure. In Game 6 of the Finals at the Garden, the noise level maxed out at 119 decibels when David Krejci scored a goal to put the Bruins up 5-1. From puck drop on, the noise level was constantly over 100 decibels- an astounding number considering that it according to NHL.com, hearing loss can result from a sustained noise level over 95 decibels.
In the Cup clinching Game 7, the Bruins got a TV rating of just over 43, which is the highest rated hockey game in Boston since the records started being kept in 1991. Comparatively speaking, that is around the average rating a Patriots football game does, and is higher than any Celtics NBA Finals game during their past two Finals appearances. Here’s a quick list of things the Bruins have pulled off as both individuals and as a team this postseason that prove the fact that hoisting Lord Stanley’s Cup was destiny:
1. The Bruins are the first team in NHL history to win 3 Game 7’s in one postseason (Only other professional sports team to do so- the 1988 Lakers)
2. Of all of those Game 7’s, they did not allow a single goal (1-0 win over Montreal, 1-0 win over Tampa Bay, 4-0 win over Vancouver)
3. For the first time in team history, they won a series after falling behind 2-0 in games (First Round vs. Montreal and Stanley Cup Finals vs. Vancouver)
4. First team in NHL history to win a 7-game series without scoring a single power play goal (First Round vs. Montreal)
5. The Bruins are only the fourth team in NHL history to win Game 7 of the Finals on the road- it was also the Bruins first ever Stanley Cup Game 7
6. Mark Recchi at 43 years old, with a goal in Game 3, is now the oldest player to record a goal Stanley Cup Finals
7. Tim Thomas set records for both saves in a single postseason with 798 and most saves in a Stanley Cup Final with 238
8. Tim Thomas also became the oldest Conn Smyth Trophy winner at age 37
9. Brad Marchand set a Bruins playoff record by scoring 11 goals in the postseason. That is good for second all time behind Dino Ciccarelli in 1981.
10. The Bruins outscored the Canucks 23-8
11. The Bruins tied a Stanley Cup Final record by scoring 8 goals in Game 3
12. 8 goals is also the number of goals the Canucks scored for THE ENTIRE SERIES (the Bruins on the other hand pumped in 23 goals)
13. The Sedin twins, the past two NHL scoring champions, were held to a combined 5 points in 7 games and both were a minus-4 in Game 7
14. The Stanley Cup Finals saw more misconducts handed out than any Finals series prior
15. After losing the first two home playoff games to Montreal, the Bruins finished the postseason on an 10-1 tear at the Garden
We sure like those apples!
Daniel Sedin's Game 7 Guarantee: Rational or Ridiculous?
Daniel Sedin's Game 7 Guarantee: Rational or Ridiculous?
By Jordan Lalor
Move over Nostradamus there’s a new prophet in town. After failing to clinch the Cup Monday night in Boston, Daniel Sedin boldly guaranteed victory tonight in Vancouver. Hearing Daniel Sedin speak is a rarity. His monotone voice makes it difficult to tell whether he’s speaking with confidence or trepidation. Either way, his words after Game 6 left no room for interpretation. “We’re going to win Game 7,” he said.
Fortunately for the mainstream media, there has been no shortage of theatrics in this year’s Stanley Cup final. Being from Massachusetts, I have the privilege of listening to 98.5 “The Sports Hub” as I make my daily commute between Needham and Franklin. While I find the hosts of the various radio shows relatively informative, I can’t help but cringe my teeth when I hear, “Hi [insert name here], you’re on the air.” From the repercussions of the Horton hit, to the vast discrepancy in home and away play, there is always someone eager to call in and give their analytic opinion over the airwaves. As much as I hate it, I always find myself listening.
The general consensus from around the Bay State seems to be that buried underneath Daniel Sedin’s tranquil, reserved exterior lies a pompous, arrogant, and pretentious attitude that has finally emerged in the face of adversity. Indeed, the Canucks have said their fair share of boneheaded things lately, but I don’t think Sedin’s comment falls into that category. I know I'm going take a lot of heat for defending Daniel Sedin here, but from a hockey standpoint it makes total sense. Allow me to explain…
For better or worse, Roberto Luongo has become the antagonist in this soap opera of a Stanley Cup Final. Undoubtedly, his play has been the single most influential factor throughout the first six games. If he plays well, the Canucks win, if he plays poorly, they lose. The discrepancy between his play in Vancouver and Boston has been very uncharacteristic of the award winning goaltender. Not only that but he can’t seem to keep his mouth shut off the ice. After allowing 8 goals in Game 3 and 4 goals in game 4, Luongo rebounded with a shutout in Game 5 and seemed to be back on track. Why he made those comments regarding Tim Thomas following a terrific Game 5 performance is beyond me. We all know how that turned out.
Clearly the mental aspect of the game has begun to take its toll on the Vancouver goaltender. If he couldn’t handle the pressure and criticism going into Game 6, how on earth is he supposed rebound for the biggest game of his life? Will he put aside his personal anguish and miraculously rise to the occasion? His teammates better hope so. I'm sure Luongo understands there is no Game 8 to redeem himself if he lets in 4 softies in the first period (again). His inconsistent play is making everybody nervous, including Daniel Sedin.
Luckily for Luongo, his thoughtless comments have taken a back seat to Sedin’s guarantee that the Canucks will hoist Lord’s Stanley Cup tonight in Vancouver. We’ll never know for sure, but I would like to think that Daniel Sedin’s comment represented self-sacrifice to the mainstream media in an altruistic attempt to vindicate his goaltender from the scrutiny and mental stress that has plagued his performances throughout the series. You don’t buy it? Maybe you think that Sedin’s comment was said to motivate his team. To that I say, it’s Game freakin’ 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals, if you need motivation there’s something wrong with you, seriously. Or, Maybe you think that his prediction just further epitomized a Canucks organization that has acted more like individuals than as a cohesive group. And to that I say, so what!
Look at this way, if they win, he will be canonized as a saint in the city of Vancouver. He will be revered for his courage and leadership at a time when his team needed it most. He will be…the man. Ok, but what if they lose? If Vancouver loses tonight, I can’t picture anybody turning around with tears and saying “But you promised!!!“ like a 5 year old who’s parents had to postpone a trip to Chuck-E-Cheese’s. If Vancouver loses tonight there’ll be bigger things for fans to worry about than a nullified guarantee. How about the fact that Sedin twins were nonexistent in the finals, Luongo couldn’t stop a beach ball in Boston, and their power play operated at a 3% success rate.
Even if Daniel Sedin’s intention was to liberate Roberto Luongo from the depths of media hell and deliver him to salvation alongside Lord Stanley, there exists a personal benefit for the 30 year-old Swed. This one small comment has given Daniel Sedin an opportunity to solidify his place in NHL history. Such predictions are nothing new to sports, or hockey. Remember when Mark Messier did it in the 1994 Eastern Conference Finals? “We will win tonight,” he said. And what happened? Not only did they win 3-2, Messier a hat trick! Had Messier and Rangers lost, he probably would have had to deal with a few postgame questions before the New York media switched their attention back to the Yankees. We always remember when someone was right, but are quick to forget when someone was wrong. That sounds like a small price to pay for a chance at sports immortality.
Thoughts on the Nathan Horton Hit
By Jeff Copetas, VP of Marketing/E-Commerce
I consider myself pretty darn lucky to be working at a hockey company. As a lifelong hockey player and on skates since the age of four, I could have never really predicted I'd be working for a growing, successful hockey equipment retailer as a CAREER! I will admit, it's a good gig. I've also been lucky because this is the first year I decided to get season tickets for the Bruins. Oh, I can't afford to be there every single game and I most definitely don't have time to, so I split them with some friends, family and surfers of Craigslist. But for these playoffs, I've been to every game with the exception of Game 2 of the first round. Regardless of how these Cup Finals end, it's been one of the best playoff rides I've ever witnessed and being able to be THERE for it has been a thrill. But I don't take it for granted.
I'm just getting around now to fully comprehending the Aaron Rome hit on Nathan Horton a few nights ago. We can go back-and-forth for a good long time on the actual hit, but I do truly believe it was a legitimate hockey hit. Right when it happened, I remember thinking to myself that it wasn't a Rule 48 hit (apparently the NHL agreed) but it was nasty and it was clearly late. Was it dirty? That's a purely subjective issue. To hear the players who know Rome talk about him, he's not *that type* player. Even players from the Bruins who know him supported that notion, so you have to give him the benefit of the doubt that the result of the hit wasn't his intention.
Look, I've played a lot of hockey. I understand that sometimes you have literally a split second to decide what to do. In this case, Rome's decision was simply the wrong one. Horribly wrong. He deserved to be suspended, without question. Four games? Again, subjective. My thinking is that the NHL saw a golden opportunity on its largest, gleaming silver stage to correct its spotty history of discipline and by golly, they did it and they were very public about it. To me, they have clearly made an example out of Rome, who is for all intents and purposes a journeyman, 5 or 6 defenseman. One has to ask - if it was Horton who put the hit on Rome, would the suspension have been four games? Think about it.
But all that is not the point. You can go north-south on these issues until the cows come home. The issue is that when it happened, I saw a 26 year kid splayed out on the ice, not really moving. What really got me was the arm, sticking straight up in the air like a dime-store mannequin who just got tossed in the dumpster. I had access to a TV, so my eyes immediately darted to it for the coverage and the replays. That wasn't any better - Horton's eyes were on the space shuttle. His breathing....crazy weird. Suddenly I wasn't hungry or thirsty anymore and my stomach literally turned. A 26 year old kid with eight paramedics working pretty feverishly around him. My mind started racing. Is he paralyzed? Stiffened limbs is a sign. Is he going to die? He's 26 for goodness sake!
As you might imagine, the building subdued itself pretty quick after the incident and it took a while (ahem, a few goals) for the crowd to really get back into it. All well and good. But years from now when I look back on this playoff run and this particular game, I will remember the feeling of fright and sympathy. I will remember the arm sticking up. The eyes. But I probably won't remember who scored in the game. Though that Marchand goal was pretty awesome.....(see bottom)
So it all comes back to appreciating what you have. If there's anything that came out of that game for me, it's never taking for granted that I can physically walk into an arena and watch a hockey game. Or show up for work every day, think, use my brain and function. I mean, what else is there? Great to see Horton is going to be ok.
Follow Us on Twitter
Get the lastest videos on YouTube
- Around the Rink (3)
- Bauer (70)
- Bauer Gloves (3)
- Bauer Helmet (5)
- Bauer Helmets (2)
- Bauer Hockey Skates (18)
- Bauer Hockey: Bauer Hockey Skates (14)
- Bauer Protective (3)
- Bauer Skates (2)
- Bauer Sticks (27)
- Bauer Sticks | Pure Hockey (14)
- Brians's Goalie Gear (2)
- Cascade Helmets (2)
- ccm (18)
- CCM Hockey: CCM Skates (9)
- CCM RBZ stick & CCM U+ | Pure Hockey (4)
- CCM Skates & CCM Stick (4)
- CCM Skates & CCM Sticks (3)
- CCM Sticks & CCM U+ | Pure Hockey (5)
- easton (71)
- Easton Helmets (2)
- Easton Hockey Sticks: Easton RS Stick (4)
- Easton Hockey Sticks: Easton S19 Stick (5)
- Easton Mako Sticks | Pure Hockey (4)
- Easton S17 Sticks | Pure Hockey (5)
- Easton Skates (8)
- Easton Sticks (15)
- Equipment Previews (17)
- Equipment Weights (12)
- Gear Talk (10)
- Hockey Glove Sizing Guide (3)
- Hockey News (8)
- Hockey Player Interviews (32)
- hockey stick information (4)
- mission (9)
- Mission Hockey: Skates (8)
- nexus stick (4)
- Off The Ice (4)
- Offseason Hockey Training (3)
- Other Interviews (15)
- Protective (6)
- Pure Goalie (6)
- Pure GOALIE Interview: Rob Howland (2)
- Pure Hockey Gives Back (2)
- Pure Hockey Stores (8)
- RBK Sticks | Pure Hockey (12)
- Reebok (34)
- Reebok Goalie Gear (14)
- Reebok Hockey: Reebok 20k (7)
- Reebok Hockey: Reebok 6k (5)
- Reebok Skates (2)
- Reebok Sticks (7)
- sherwood (12)
- Sherwood Hockey: Sherwood Hockey Sticks & Sherwood Goalie Sticks | Pure Hockey (11)
- Sticks & Gloves | Pure Hockey (9)
- test ccm (3)
- TV Commercials (8)
- Useful Pure Hockey Information (8)
- warrior (23)
- Warrior Hockey: Warrior Hockey Sticks & Gloves | Pure Hockey (1)
- Warrior Hockey: Warrior Hockey Sticks & Warrior Gloves | Pure Hockey (11)
- Warrior Sticks (4)
- Welcome (4)